Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 SO2D 231 - Miller v. Oubre

Miller v. Oubre’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2014

7 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Francis v. Morial · St. Charles Gaming v. Riverboat Gaming · LeBlanc v. Altobello

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in affairs of local concern, a home rule charter government possesses `powers which within its jurisdiction are as broad as that of the state, except when limited by the constitution, laws permitted by the constitution, or its own home rule charter.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “of a special election, but only to the reopening of the qualifying period and the resulting re-scheduling of the election to the general election date. Moreover, although plaintiffs request that the names of any candidate qualifying during the reopened qualifying period be withdrawn, see LSA-R.S. 18:494, the petition does not name a candidate, nor has any candidate been served or given an opportunity to respond to the challenge. See LSA-R.S. 18:1402(A); 18:1406(C). The time constraints provided for in LSA-R.S. 18:1409 do not apply where there is no objection to the candidacy of a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “freedom and flexibility to manage its own local affairs without undue legislative influence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.