682 So. 2d 331 - JAG v. Schmaltz’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Wimberly v. Gatch · 666 So. 2d 1073 - Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. · 655 So. 2d 309 - Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. · Vaughan Contractors, Inc. v. Cahn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because even uncontradicted expert testimony is not binding on the factfinder, Sanders v. Wysocki, 92-1190, p. ___ (La.App. 4th Cir.1/27/94), 631 So.2d 1330, 1334 , writ denied, 94-0506 (La.4/22/94), 637 So.2d 156 -57, the acceptance of one expert's opinion over that of two others does not represent an abuse of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.