Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 So. 2d 340 - Brown v. State

682 So. 2d 340 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
3
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

92 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Gray v. State (1998), 805 So. 2d 452 - Simmons v. State (2001)

92 state decisions

530199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Massiah v. United States · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Lowenfield v. Phelps · Clemons v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an objection at trial cannot be enlarged in a reviewing court to embrace an omission not complained of at trial.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 891 So. 2d 813 - Young v. State · 763 So. 2d 189 - Brown v. State
  2. “Each case must be decided on its own peculiar fact situation.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 945 So. 2d 326 - Howard v. State · 737 So. 2d 275 - Edwards v. State
  3. “At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion. This rule does not authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or (3) a person whose •presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of his cause.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Proby v. State · 748 So. 2d 77 - State v. Blenden

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.