Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 SO2D 430 - Gober v. Stubbs

Gober v. Stubbs’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco · 122 Cal. App. 2d 777 - Redevelopment Agency v. Hayes · Newberry v. City of Andalusia · Rogers v. City of Mobile · Opinion of the Justices

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The right of eminent domain antedates constitutions, and is an incident of sovereignty, inherent in, and belonging to every sovereign State. The only qualification of the [inherent] right is, that the use for which private property may be taken shall be public.... The constitution [of our State] did not assume to confer the power of eminent domain, but, recognizing its existence, [further] limited its exercise by requiring that just compensation shall be made.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for the benefit of the commuting public,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.