Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 SO2D 467 - Ex Parte Anderson

Ex Parte Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Ex Parte Essary (2007), 959 So. 2d 72 - SB v. Saint James School (2006)

23 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 547 So. 2d 870 - West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida · 538 So. 2d 794 - Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY. · Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc. · 531 So. 2d 860 - Bussey v. John Deere Co. · McNeil v. Munson S. S. Lines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “510 So.2d at 145-46 (citations omitted.) See also, Central Alabama Electric Cooperative v. Tapley , 546 So.2d 371 (Ala. 1989).”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Although Anderson may have been negligent in turning left while her view of the oncoming traffic was blocked, we do not believe that this evidence is sufficient to prove that she was guilty of `wanton conduct,' as that term is defined in our cases. In other words, viewing the evidence most favorably to Hughes, we find no substantial evidence that the defendant Anderson acted `with knowledge of danger, or with consciousness, that the doing [of the act would] likely result in injury.' Lynn Strickland , 510 So.2d at 145 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Anderson could not see if any traffic was approaching her as she turned, because her vision was partially blocked by an automobile, which was waiting to turn left in the opposite left-turn lane.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.