Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 So. 2d 488 - Weaver v. State

682 So. 2d 488 - Weaver v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2011

7 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB · Brewster v. Derwinski · Halas v. Department of Energy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`"The trial judge `plays a "pivotal role" in determining whether a prima facie case has been made under Batson because he or she observes the voir dire procedure firsthand and is in a far better position than we to assess the prosecutor's decisions.' . . . An appellate court may reverse the trial court's determination that the prosecutor's peremptory challenges were not motivated by intentional discrimination only if that determination is `clearly erroneous.'"'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The refusal of a requested written instruction, although a correct statement of law, shall not be cause for reversal on appeal if it appears that the same rule of law was substantially and fairly given to the jury in the court's oral charge or in other charges given at the request of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.