Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 So. 2d 555 - Walker v. State

682 So. 2d 555 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2013

12 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 405 So. 2d 418 - Jollie v. State · 659 So. 2d 1082 - The Florida Bar v. Burkich-Burrell · 681 So. 2d 1136 - King v. State · King v. State · Walker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e also noted that while such a hybrid split sentence is not authorized by statute or rule it is not an "illegal" sentence. King , at 1140. Thus, where a defendant agrees to such a sentence as part of an otherwise valid plea agreement and the negotiated sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum for the particular offense involved, the court may impose incarceration under the guidelines followed by probation as an habitual offender. Id. at 1140-41 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sentenced to five and one-half years' incarceration to be followed by nine and one-half years' probation and that he would be treated as an habitual offender if he violated probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the record reveals that Walker's sentence was part of a plea bargain, that he understood the consequences of the sentence, and that the negotiated sentence did not exceed the maximum allowed by law for the offense of delivery of cocaine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.