Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

682 So. 2d 572

Odom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-10-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1997

1 state decisions

Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-10-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The lower court’s summary denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief is affirmed except as to the claim that the habitual offender, sentences were improperly made to run consecutive to each other. Appellant has asserted the offenses arose from a single criminal episode. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). The lower court must either attach portions of the record refuting the claim, conduct a hearing on the claim, or grant relief.

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/682/so2d/572 · .json · Public domain