Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 682 SO2D 602 - Hankin v. State

Hankin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. United States · 616 So. 2d 1 - State v. Johnson · 581 So. 2d 897 - Puffinberger v. State · Cuda v. State · Sanicola v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he existing law was Puffinberger v. State, 581 So.2d 897 (Fla.1991), where the supreme court held that the law in effect at the end of the criminal enterprise applied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “defined by the latter part of the phrase that begins `by means of concealment, guile, or fraud.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the statute is not constitutionally infirm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.