Quinn v. Settel’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A · 42 U.S.C. § 11601 (International Child Abduction Remedies Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 11603 · 42 U.S.C. § 11607
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Friedrich v. Friedrich · Feder v. Evans-Feder · Levesque v. Levesque · 845 F. Supp. 916 - Currier v. Currier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“certain particular circumstances will tend to ameliorate some of the perceived undesirable effects of such arrangements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.