Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

682 So. 2d 643

Perez v. Byrd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-11-01

Relies on Spanagel v. Love

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-11-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 district · 12 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The only meritorious issue raised is the correctness of the trial court’s order granting mistrial based upon a witness’s statement indicating that the Plaintiff had received a traffic citation. The trial court found that the gratuitous comment was a clear implication of the Plaintiffs fault and granted a mistrial. We affirm. See Spanagel v. Love, 585 So.2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

COBB, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
/682/so2d/643 · .json · Public domain