Ecroyd v. Ecroyd’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 403 So. 2d 56 - Curtis v. Curtis · Veron v. Veron · Miller v. Duthu · 625 So. 2d 1112 - Cutting v. Cutting · 524 So. 2d 10 - Bolden v. Bolden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the facts underlying that decision were not reported by either the appellate court or the supreme court, we find the per curiam opinion to be of little precedential value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.