Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 A.2d 40 - Porter v. Pathfinder Services, Inc.

Porter v. Pathfinder Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2012

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

20199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co. · Gattis v. State · Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America · Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. Martin · Lester C. Newton Trucking Company v. Neal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of an employer-employee relationship is an issue of law.”); Barnard v. State, 642 A.2d 808, 813 (Del.Super.Ct. 1992)(”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[In determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists,] [iJhe greatest weight is given to the issue of control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.