Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 F.2d 1163 - Holtan v. Parratt

Holtan v. Parratt’s Empirical Analysis

683 F.2d 1163 · 1982

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2010

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

1901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Frady · Lockett v. Ohio · Engle v. Isaac · State v. Turner · United States v. Easter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when Holtan entered his plea, the trial court entered into an extensive colloquy with the defendant, covering forty pages of transcript, and did a commendable job both of informing Holtan of the consequences of the plea and of satisfying itself that Holtan understood these consequences. ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “at no time during this colloquy did the parties or the court discuss the possibility that witnesses to the shooting could and would testify at the sentence hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Consequently, we cannot conclude with certainty that Holtan would have been allowed to withdraw his plea if a request for such withdrawal had been timely made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.