McGhee v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.2d 256 · 1982
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently January 2005 · most notably Podedworny v. Harris (1984), O'Leary v. Schweiker (1983)
37 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · McCoy v. Schweiker · Brinker v. Weinberger · Hankerson v. Harris · Emil C. Timmerman v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of H.E.W., Kenneth Marks v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of H.E.W.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is essential that the record clearly indicate that the vocational expert considered the particular individual disabilities of the claimant in evaluating her ability to perform alternative employment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“pose[ ] a generalized hypothetical question to [a] vocational expert which assume[s]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.