Dickson v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.2d 348 · 1982
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Martin v. Wainwright (1985), Raulerson v. Wainwright (1984)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Haines v. Kerner · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Goldstein v. United States · Myers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“material in the sense of a crucial, critical, highly significant factor.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An evidentiary error does not justify habeas relief unless the violation results in a denial of fundamental fairness.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]his court will not 'blindly accept speculative and inconcrete claims' as the basis upon which a hearing will be ordered,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.