Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 F.2d 396 - Ramos v. United States

Ramos v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

683 F.2d 396 · 1982

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2017

5 federal appellate ·

801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6532 · 41 U.S.C. § 606 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7703

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · United States v. Sherwood · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Boddie v. Connecticut · Soriano v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he analogy petitioner suggests to the cases interpreting Title VII is at best imperfect.... [Interpretation of the procedural requirements of Title VII must be closely tied to Title VII’s specific constitutional concerns, its detailed legislative history, and its interpretive regulations .... As these same factors are not present as to the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, any analogy of the Title VII cases to this case is tenuous at best.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review must be filed within 30 days after the date the petitioner received notice of the final order or decision of the Board.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “constituted notice to petitioner within the meaning”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.