Stone v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.2d 449 · 1982
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Doe v. United States Department of Justice (1985), Clark v. Library of Congress (1984)
17 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 687 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Relies on Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · First Investment Annuity Co. of America v. Miller · Lee v. Thornton · Doyle v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“remain in District Court under the Tucker Act even if their damages exceed $10,000 in amount, as long as they waive any claims in excess of $10,000.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waters v. Rumsfeld
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.