Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 F.2d 511 - Local 1219, American Federation of Government Employees v. Donovan

Local 1219, American Federation of Government Employees v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis

683 F.2d 511 · 1982

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
April 2000
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2000 · most notably BUTLER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (2000), Mailman v. Commissioner (1988)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

180198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Service v. Dulles · United States v. Caceres · Dunlop v. Bachowski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “necessarily turns on pragmatic considerations as to whether an agency determination is the proper subject of judicial review____ In making this determination, we ... evaluate the relevance of three particularly important factors: the need for judicial supervision to safeguard the interests of the plaintiffs; the impact of review on the effectiveness of the agency in carrying out its congressionally assigned role; and the appropriateness of the issues raised for judicial review____ Finally, we inquire whether the considerations in favor of nonreviewability thus identified are sufficiently compelling to rebut the strong presumption of judicial review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not contemplate that the Director shall have complete discretion”) with 5 C.F.R. § 2471.11 (reiterating statutory language; Panel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “statutes are drawn in such broad terms that in a given case there is no law to apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.