Harris v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.2d 97 · 1982
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Tucker · Carafas v. J · Jones v. Cunningham · Peyton v. Rowe · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The effect given the prior conviction in the State with present custody does not re-establish the first State's custody over the prisoner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marks v. Rees“if at all, in an appropriate proceeding such as one under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.