United States v. Ebron’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.3d 105 · 2012
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3591 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3592 · 18 U.S.C. § 3593 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Gregg v. Georgia · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · United States v. Young · United States v. Cotton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the clear and credible nature of the foreperson's allegations, the district court had a sufficient basis for initiating an investigation to uncover whether a juror was in fact refusing to follow instructions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review a district court's response to juror misconduct for abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“failure to follow the Court's instructions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.