Doe v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.3d 390 · 2012
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 801 (Military Justice Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Feres v. United States · Davis v. Passman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Supreme Court has never implied a Bivens remedy in a case involving the military, national security, or intelligence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“directly implicated by the defense of qualified immunity and [is] properly before us on interlocutory appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rodriguez v. Swartz“340 U.S. 135 , 146, 71 S.Ct. 153 , 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950). '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.