Brault v. Social Security Administration’s Empirical Analysis
683 F.3d 443 · 2012
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Richardson v. Perales · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Dickinson v. Zurko · United States v. Fernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a very deferential standard of review-even more so than the 'clearly erroneous' standard.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The substantial evidence standard means once an ALJ finds facts, [a court] can reject those facts only if a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude otherwise .”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to determine de novo whether [a claimant] is disabled.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.