Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 F.3d 697 - United States v. Collins

United States v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

683 F.3d 697 · 2012

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Olano · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Rhode Island v. Innis · United States v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant qualifies for a decrease under subsection (a), the offense level determined prior to the operation of subsection (a) is level 16 or greater, and upon motion of the government stating that the defendant has assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution of his own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the government to avoid preparing for trial and permitting the government and the court to allocate their resources efficiently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The defendant must present objective evidence of an improper motive or arbitrary action to overcome the government's decision not to file a § 3E1.1(b) motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whereas forfeiture is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right, waiver is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.