Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 F. Supp. 182 - Arendall v. Dutton

683 F. Supp. 182 - Arendall v. Dutton’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2003
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on McMann v. Richardson · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Evitts v. Lucey · Moore v. Sims · Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.