683 F. Supp. 84 - Foster v. Celani’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) an individual who lives alone or who, while living with others, customarily purchases food and prepares meals for home consumption separate and apart from the others, or (2) a group of individuals who live together and customarily purchase food and prepare meals together for home consumption; except that parents and children, or siblings, who live together shall be treated as a group of individuals who customarily purchase and prepare meals together for home consumption even if they do not do so, unless one of the parents, or siblings, is an elderly or disabled member.... In no event shall any individual or group of individuals constitute a household if they reside in an institution or boarding house, or else live with others and pay compensation to the others for meals.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rios v. South Dakota Department of Social Services · Murray v. Lyng

2. “the money is paid directly to the foster family * * * that money still constitutes the 'income and resources' of the foster child.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Murray v. Lyng

3. “while a boarder's income is not included in the calculation of food stamp household income,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Murray v. Lyng