Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 N.E.2d 560 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2018

13 state decisions

50199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Kellogg v. United States · Spranger v. State · Lowery v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The substantial step element of attempt requires proof of any overt act beyond mere preparation and in furtherance of the intent to commit the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person attempts to commit a crime when, acting with the culpability required for commission of the crime, he engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This requirement has been de-seribed as a minimal one, State v. Van Cleave, 674 N.E.2d 1293, 1304 (Ind.1996), reh'g denied, but the conduct must strongly corroborate the defendant's eriminal intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.