Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 SO2D 1272 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2018

22 state decisions

110199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · North Carolina v. Alford · Dunaway v. New York · Argersinger v. Hamlin · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court cannot be called upon to appoint other counsel than the one originally appointed merely to please the desires of the indigent accused, in the absence of an adequate showing that the court appointed attorney is inept or incompetent to represent the accused. State v. O'Neal, 501 So.2d 920 (La.App. 2d Cir.1987), writ denied, 505 So.2d 1139 (La.1987).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The admissibility of a confession is a question for the trial judge, and his conclusion on the credibility and weight of testimony relating to the voluntariness of a confession for the purpose of admissibility will not be overturned on appeal unless not supported by the evidence. State v. Dailey, 607 So.2d 904 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.