Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 So. 2d 1335 - State v. Roberts

683 So. 2d 1335 - State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Sepulvado · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · State v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “makes no measurable contribution to acceptable penal goals and, therefore, constitutes nothing more than a needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “On June 10,1992, the New Iberia Police Department was involved in an undercover narcotics operation. The target group for this particular operation was street level dealers within New Iberia. In the instant case, Detective Arthur Welch, an undercover narcotics agent with the St. Mary Parish Sheriffs Office, and a confidential informant were working together in a vehicle when they spotted Defendant driving his truck. They flagged the Defendant down. He stopped his truck and walked over to the undercover vehicle where he distributed one rock of crack cocaine to Officer Welch. Officer Welch was wired with a wireless body wire and there was a resultant audio tape of the entire transaction. Also, two other police officers drove by the distribution scene and videotaped the Defendant and his vehicle. The Defendant was arrested at a later date.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.