Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 So. 2d 572 - Davis v. State

683 So. 2d 572 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2018

4 state decisions

20199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · Rogers v. Corrosion Products, Inc. · 648 So. 2d 660 - Heath v. State · 648 So. 2d 715 - Perez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “places the burden on the state, as the beneficiary of the error, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict, or alternatively stated, that there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]here harmless error is urged by the state in response to rule 3.850 claim that counsel should have preserved an error for appeal, the trial court performs the DiGuilio analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.