683 So. 2d 579 - Oldham v. Oldham’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2016
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · 418 So. 2d 437 - Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc. · Mettler v. Mettler · 553 So. 2d 340 - Hanks v. Hanks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent a showing that either marital funds, assets, or the work efforts of one or both spouses contributed to the enhanced value of the asset, the appreciated value of one spouse's nonmarital asset occurring during the marriage is not subject to equitable distribution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he enhancement in value and appreciation of nonmarital assets resulting either from the efforts of either party or from the contribution thereto or the expenditure thereon of marital funds ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n an appropriate dissolution case, ... once the issue of entitlement to attorney’s fees has been determined utilizing the established ‘need and ability to pay’ standard, the trial judge may consider whether litigation was unnecessarily prolonged by a party’s unreasonable refusal to accept an offer of settlement, in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.