Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

683 So. 2d 626

Tate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-11-27

Relies on 648 So. 2d 308 - Luby v. State

Decided 1996-11-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentences. We strike, however, the words “to pay for” from condition 8 of the orders of probation because that portion is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

¶2Affirmed as modified.

FRANK, A.C.J., and BLUE and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
/683/so2d/626 · .json · Public domain