Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

683 So. 2d 640

Rhodes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-12-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Brooks v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-12-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this direct criminal appeal, appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to file a brief in proper person, appellant has elected not to do so. Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the $2.00 cost imposed for Criminal Justice Education by Municipalities and Counties be stricken, because this was a discretionary cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), and could not be imposed without affording appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. E.g., Brooks v. State, 676 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
/683/so2d/640 · .json · Public domain