Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 SO2D 917 - State v. Vale

State v. Vale’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 650 So. 2d 379 - State v. Vale · Harkins v. Gauthe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the damaging potential of the blocked-out cross-examination, even if fully understood by jurors, would not have, beyond a reasonable doubt, made a difference in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of the state,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.