Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 683 SW2D 705 - Stasey v. State

Stasey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Houlihan v. State · Tamez v. State · 9 Okla. Crim. 76 - Ex Parte Eley · Ex Parte Esquivel · Ex Parte Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he jurisdiction of a court in which a sentence requiring confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections is imposed for conviction (of a felony) shall continue for 180 days from the date the execution of the sentence actually begins. After the expiration of 60 days but prior to the expiration of 180 days from the date the execution of the sentence actually begins, the judge of the court that imposed such sentence may on his own motion or on written motion of the defendant, suspend further execution of the sentence imposed and place the defendant on probation ..., if in the opinion of the judge the defendant would not benefit from further incarceration....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant should not be penalized if the relief he requests is proper and only through the improper actions of the trial court does the order become void. Thus, if a defendant, who is statutorily eligible for shock probation, requests that the trial court consider his motion within the statutorily defined time limits, and the trial court unilaterally, but erroneously, grants the probation, the defendant is entitled to credit for the time between premature release and the date jurisdiction to grant shock probation attaches.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.