Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 A2D 756 - Davis v. Mitchell

Davis v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wilson · Redden v. McGill · A. L. W. v. J. H. W.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the end of any hearing or within a reasonable time thereafter, a Master shall enter the order in writing which shall announce the result and provide an explanation therefor. Every written order by a Master shall inform aE parties that, as provided in this section, there is an absolute right to a review de novo by a Judge and that in the absence of a request within 15 days for de novo review, the written order of a Master shaE become enforceable by any legal means. Any party may obtain a review de novo of any Master’s written order by a Judge by filing with the Court a written request therefor within 15 days from the date of a Master’s written order; except, however, there shaE be no review by a Judge in contravention of any state or federal constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.