Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 F.2d 1 - Tarpley v. Greene

Tarpley v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis

684 F.2d 1 · 1982

Citation profile

155
cited by 155 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 35 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 155 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2021 · most notably Jett v. Dallas Independent School District (1989), Hobson v. Wilson (1984)

67 federal appellate · 35 district · 6 state decisions

61019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Owen v. City of Independence

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ral argument on appeal is not the proper time to advance new arguments or legal theories....”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a concise 'statement of genuine issues' setting forth all material facts as to which it is contended there exists a genuine issue necessary to be litigated.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.