Vasquez v. Strada’s Empirical Analysis
684 F.3d 431 · 2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 17541
Relies on Woodall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons · Barden v. Keohane · United States v. Cepero · Phillip B. Moscato 08126-050 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons L.S.C.I. Allenwood, Phillip B. Moscato · Bradshaw v. Carlson B US E US Po Vi 00801
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“asked the District Court to direct the BOP to provide him with the maximum 12-month RRC placement, he was not merely challenging the construction of the Second Chance Act, or the BOP's implementation of the Federal prisoner reentry initiative [and so] [e]xhaustion was required ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“purposes for which the sentence to imprisonment was determined to be warranted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“recommending a type of penal or correctional facility[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.