Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 FAPPX 37 - United States v. Springer

United States v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 18 U.S.C. § 2256 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583

Relies on United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. · United States v. Poitra · United States v. Carlton · United States v. Reeves · United States v. Cabot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recommending that Springer be prohibited from accessing any pornographic materials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.