684 F. Supp. 2d 760 - Vitullo v. Mancini’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692D (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692G (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692N (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 53 (Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 3624
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Califano v. Yamasaki · Miller Superintendent Pendleton Correctional Facility v. French · Weiss v. Regal Collections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in the FDCPA suggests, explicitly or implicitly, that debtors might seek declaratory judgments cancelling or extinguishing accrued debts, in lieu of damages, for FDCPA violations ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.