Jones v. Harner’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 165 Ind. App. 185 - Hendrickson & Sons Motor Co. v. OSHA · Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants Bank · Kirk v. Monroe County Tire · Clark County Division of Family & Childrens Services v. Turner · 146 Ind. App. 209 - Eidson's Paint & Body Shop, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Plan, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record reveals that although Jones initially did not request nor consent to the towing and storage of his vehicle he became aware that Harner had provided these services shortly after the towing occurred. Jones did not make a demand for the return of his vehicle but instead agreed to the charges and allowed the continued storage. The trial court found that Jones's "waiver, acquiescence and inaction in allowing the continued storage (after his contact with Harner and his promise to pay the storage charges) constitutes his implied consent to the storage." Record at 86. The record supports the trial court's finding. Harner retained possession of the vehicle throughout these proceedings, and thus he is entitled to a lien in the amount of the services rendered pursuant to .C. § 9-22-5-15.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“hen was long recognized at common law,” and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.