State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · Georgia v. McCollum · United States v. Moore · State v. Flores
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subdivision 1. Aiding, abetting; liability. A person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime. Subd. 2. Expansive liability. A person liable under subdivision 1 is also liable for any other crime committed in pursuance of the intended crime if reasonably foreseeable by the person as a probable consequence of committing or attempting to commit the crime intended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[O]nce the opponent of a peremptory challenge has made out a prima facie case of racial discrimination (step one), the burden of production shifts to the proponent of the strike to come forward with a race-neutral explanation (step two). If a race-neutral explanation is tendered, the trial court must then decide (step three) whether the opponent of the strike has proved purposeful discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pendleton“instructions ..., read as a whole, did not serve to confuse or mislead the jury and did not materially misstate the law.” White I, 684 N.W.2d at 509 . 4 . Indeed, White cited a lone Minnesota state case in support of his”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.