State v. Nitz’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kott v. State · State v. Clouatre · Vail v. State · State v. Williams · State v. Kott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The period of delay resulting from other proceedings concerning the defendant, including but not limited to motions to dismiss or suppress ... [is exempted from the speedy trial calculation]. [However, no] pre-trial motion shall be held under advisement for more than 30 days[,] and any time longer than 30 days shall not be considered as an excluded period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garcia v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.