Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 S.E.2d 577 - Whitehead v. Com.

Whitehead v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bolden v. Com. · Brown v. Com. · Eason v. Eason · Commonwealth v. Shifflett · Hamilton v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellate court may affirm the judgment of a trial court when it has reached the right result for the wrong reason. However, [t]he rule does not always apply---- [T]he proper application of this rule does not include those cases where, because the trial court has rejected the right reason or confined its decision to a specific ground, further factual resolution is needed before the right reason may be assigned to support the trial court’s decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.