Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 SE2D 745 - In Re FGJ

In Re FGJ’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Ballard · 140 N.C. App. 288 - In Re Huff · 142 N.C. App. 607 - In Re Blackburn · 123 N.C. App. 434 - Matter of Oghenekevebe · 151 N.C. App. 94 - In Re Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any objection [was] waived, and the testimony must be considered competent evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e hold that the trial court failed to make sufficient findings of fact on that ground to permit appellate review and, therefore, remand for further findings of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the trial court's current findings [were] insufficient to permit this Court to review its decision under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.