Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 So. 2d 1099 - Long v. Long

684 So. 2d 1099 - Long v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2017

9 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · Darville v. Texaco, Inc. · Kuebler v. Martin · 455 So. 2d 1374 - Turner v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hese stipulations and resulting judgment have occurred after evidence has been produced, and * * * that any future modification of the judgment * * * shall be held to the standard of proof articulated in the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Bergeron [.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the instant case, efforts at mediation failed; a trial started and recessed and, over a two week period, protracted discussions were conducted, resulting in a detailed custody sharing plan that provided for all of the usual holidays. The entire process was contentious. Under these circumstances, we consider the 1992 judgment adopting the joint stipulations to be a considered decree and therefore subject to the Bergeron burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.