Horton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 683 So. 2d 475 - In Re Amendment to Fla. Rules of Crim. · State v. Johnson · 667 So. 2d 910 - Hughes v. State · Fellman v. State · Francois v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Horton is not entitled to credit toward probation for time spent in jail on an unrelated charge, awaiting an adjudication of the probation violation charge. See Weeks v. State, 496 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (probation tolled while defendant is prisoner in another jurisdiction as defendant was not under probationary supervision during that period).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[ejredit for time spent on probation begins on the date the probation order is entered, and ends on the date the probation violation has occurred, as determined by the court, or, if that date cannot be ascertained, on the date the affidavit of probation is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.