Hollinger v. Hollinger’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 617 So. 2d 313 - Henderson v. Singletary · 583 So. 2d 654 - Hamlet v. Hamlet · 608 So. 2d 838 - Ugarte v. Ugarte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Alimony awards should be based on current existing circumstances and not on possibilities likely but not yet realized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on the basis of the evidence before [the court] at the time and not what would or might happen in the future”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.