Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 SO2D 290 - Steel v. State

Steel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2018

18 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Knight v. State · 608 So. 2d 111 - Young v. State · Wright v. Scott · 660 So. 2d 374 - Anthony v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A claim that misinformation supplied by counsel induced a defendant to reject a favorable plea offer can constitute actionable ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must establish that if he had been correctly advised, he would have accepted the plea offer and that his acceptance would have resulted in a lesser sentence. An evidentiary hearing is necessary as to cases 98-4769 and 98-4826 to establish the terms of the plea offer, when the offer was made, and whether the pre-trial offer was more favorable than the sentence defendant received.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “necessary to establish the terms of the plea offer, when the offer was made, and whether the pre-trial offer was more favorable than the sentence defendant received”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.