Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 684 So. 2d 38 - State v. Iles

684 So. 2d 38 - State v. Iles’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2019

16 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · 573 So. 2d 528 - State v. Benjamin · 440 So. 2d 1330 - State v. Allen · In re Naccari · State v. Pitre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to convict an accused of driving while intoxicated, the prosecution need only prove that defendant was operating a vehicle and that defendant was under the influence of alcohol or drugs. State v. Edwards , 591 So.2d 748 (La.App. 1 Cir.1991). Some behavioral manifestations, independent of any scientific test, are sufficient to support a charge of driving while intoxicated. Id. ; State v. Pitre , 532 So.2d 424 (La.App. 1 Cir.1988), writ denied , 538 So.2d 590 (La.1989). It is not necessary that a conviction of D.W.I. be based upon a blood or breath alcohol test, and the observations of an arresting officer may be sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. Intoxication is an observable condition about which a witness may testify. State v. Allen , 440 So.2d 1330 (La.1983).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Likewise, we remand for the trial court to impose and set the amount of a supervision fee. If the trial court sets the amount at the minimum fee, the trial court can correct the sentence by following the procedures set forth in Harris . If, however, the trial court wishes to set a higher fee, the sentence must be vacated and the Defendant resentenced in open court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.